Satellite Radio A to Z
XM and Sirius go head to head in a Rocky Mountain road trip.
The
temperature was chilly - at least to two southerners - but even the coldest day
in Rocky Mountain National Park is sweltering compared to the frigid -450°
void of outer space. At 9,000 feet, we were well above sea level, but low compared
to the orbiting satellites that transmit the signals for the XM and Sirius radio
services from as high as 29,000 miles above terra firma. The top speeds of our
Audi and BMW vehicles were fast by earthly standards, but positively sluggish
compared to the 9,000-mile-per-hour velocity of the space vehicles in question.
Our world and theirs could hardly be more different, yet we were comfortably linked
by heavenly music floating down from above.
Jump ahead:
What's on Sirius
What's on XM
Gear to Go
UPDATE: Sirius Revamps Its Codec
Music of the Spheres
For the most part, radio is a terrestrial business. Although AM and FM signals
reach us through thin air (and radiate outward into space), radio-station transmitters
use earthbound towers to broadcast their signals. Since that technology, along
with government regulation, limits the range of reception, these stations can
only provide local service. And since terrestrial broadcasting is analog, the
signal will waver as you drive, and numerous noises will intrude. (Digital terrestrial
radio is in the works, though, and could debut as early as next year.)
The XM and Sirius radio services are seeking to change the broadcasting business
by using satellites to receive signals and then transmit them back to earth
so they can be picked up throughout the lower 48 United States. This provides
a virtually national radio service, since the same stations can be received
in the entire coverage area. And since the transmissions are digital, they're
immune to most of the reception problems that plague analog radio.
To receive the 100 channels from either service, you'll need a Sirius or XM
car receiver and a subscription that costs $12.95 or $9.95 a month, respectively.
XM provides 71 music channels and 29 news/talk/sports channels, and it's being
supported by General Motors, Honda, Suzuki, Isuzu, and others. Sirius provides
60 music channels and 40 news/talk/sports channels, and it's partnered with
Ford, DaimlerChrysler, BMW, Mazda, and others. Add-on receivers are available
from a variety of mobile-electronics manufacturers, with home units to become
available in the next few years.
XM has been available nationally since November 12, 2001. Sirius began its rollout
earlier this year in Fort Worth and Houston, Texas; Jackson, Mississippi; and
Denver, Colorado. It has since expanded into most of the Midwest and plans to
offer service nationally by July 1. While the current receivers are designed
to pull in either XM or Sirius exclusively, head units that can receive both
are expected to be available in about five years.
Head to Head
Since analog terrestrial radio has served us well for over 80 years, do we really
need digital satellite radio? Is it worth the premium cost over free radio?
If it is, which is better - Sirius or XM?
To explore those questions, we requested test vehicles from the respective services
and hit the road. Sirius supplied a BMW X5 3.0i with a Kenwood KTC-SR901 tuner,
while XM set us up with an Audi S4 with a Pioneer GEX-FM903XM receiver. The
BMW was outfitted with a high-end aftermarket all-Kenwood system that included
a 7-inch touchscreen monitor for the AM/FM/Sirius receiver, a DVD-based navigation
system, and 1,000 watts of amplification. The Audi's sound system was more modest.
The XM receiver was patched into the factory installed Bose system using a BlitzSafe
interface. (BlitzSafe creates a digital connection, as opposed to the FM-modulated
connections that are commonly used to hook up an external component like a CD
changer or portable CD player.) Bottom line: both systems were equipped to provide
good sound quality.
We wanted answers to three basic questions:
1) How reliable is the signal reception?
2) How good is the sound quality (irrespective of reception interference)?
3) How good is the programming?
You wouldn't normally ask that last question when you're buying a radio. But,
unlike AM and FM radio, Sirius and XM are "closed" systems, meaning
that you can only listen to what their DJs provide. Sure, you can change channels,
but you can't escape what the company is offering (unless you tune back to old-fashioned
AM or FM broadcasts).
The Mile-High City
Our approach to the comparison was simple: Two vehicles. Two days. One of us
in each vehicle, switching cars after one day. Both of us driving the same route
at the same time, staying in touch by walkie-talkie. Each of us listening carefully
for reception robustness, sound quality, and content. The first criterion is
objective. Like so much digital technology, these are "all or nothing"
systems. When they fail, they fall silent. The second criterion is semi-subjective.
All listeners have different ideas about sound quality. The last criterion,
of course, is completely subjective. One person's Beethoven is another person's
Poison.
We wanted our road test to include both urban and rural areas. Even though the
signals from the Sirius and XM satellites cover the entire continental U.S.
except Alaska, things like buildings, mountains, tunnels, and bridges can cause
gaps in the coverage that can be filled by local terrestrial transmitters that
repeat the satellite signal. The receiver automatically switches to this "gap
filler" frequency when it loses its lock on the satellite.
XM has already established its network of repeaters, but Sirius was only just
completing its gap-filler infrastructure when we took our test drive. Its network
in Denver, however, was up and working fine, which is why we chose that area.
The Denver area proved to be perfect for testing the services. The city's buildings
were tall enough and the streets narrow enough to test the repeaters. And the
twisting roads through the narrow canyons of the nearby Rocky Mountains, where
there are no repeaters, stressed the receivers and their antennas to their limits.
We started our trip in the city's concrete and steel canyons. The Colorado Rockies
were at home, so a trip downtown to Coors Field seemed in order. XM and Sirius
use different technologies to deliver signals to their repeaters, but both were
very reliable, shrugging off the skyscrapers along 17th Street without a hitch.
Even an overpass walkway posed no problems. After several hours of in-town driving,
each system had experienced exactly one momentary drop-out - in the same spot
along a downtown street. We were impressed by the robustness of both signals.
Of course, it would be a mistake to overgeneralize these results, since each
system's urban reliability is largely a function of its repeaters - the results
in your city may be different. After stopping to grab a hotdog at the ballpark,
we turned toward the mountains.
