

The rear panel of the Pringles Can Speaker; the design includes a vent (visible below the battery compartment) that blows sound out the back, using the can as a resonator to boost bass — tinkering with the absorptiveness of the can's interior proved to be the key to getting better performance.

Frequency response of the Pringles can speaker in four configurations. The blue trace shows the result when the speaker is attached to a large empty can. The red trace is the large can when stuffed with 1 oz of insulation. The green trace is with the speaker attached to a small can. The orange trace is the small can packed with 0.4 oz of insulation.
Examining the speaker’s plastic enclosure, I came up with no brilliant ideas for improving the sound. I thought about adding some filters to tame that fearsome treble, but I knew I’d lose a lot of output that way. I noticed a little ventilated section in the back, though, which suggested maybe the speaker was blowing sound out the rear and using the can as a resonator to boost the bass. So maybe there was something I could do with the can itself.
Then I remembered that you can buy Pringles in two sizes: the Super Stack and the Grab & Go! Stack. The former measures about 10.5 inches long, the latter only about 4.8 inches. I headed down to the 7-Eleven to grab a Grab & Go! and a Diet Coke, quickly consumed 375 calories worth of junk food, then pulled out the Clio again.
To my disappointment, a close-miked measurement showed the two cans measured almost the same in the bass, indicating that very little sound was getting out that rear vent. I did notice, though, that the little can didn’t have the big can’s nasty resonance at 740 Hz. Aha! Progress!
I then got the bright idea of stuffing the cans with absorptive material, the same way a manufacturer would fill an acoustic-suspension speaker with fiberglass to soak up the woofer’s back wave. I stuffed the large can with 1 oz of recycled-denim insulation, which translates to a density of about 3 pounds per cubic foot. Then I ran another measurement. Eureka! The 740 Hz resonance was gone, the bass peak at 280 Hz was tamped down, and the midrange was considerably smoother. It sounded better, too, because the resonances inside the can were killed and the can’s sides vibrated much less. The only downside was that the “bass” was slightly less rocking, although it sounded tighter and better-defined.
The small can benefitted just as much from 0.4 oz of stuffing, delivering a nearly identical response to the large can. I tried using just 0.2 oz, but such a low density of stuffing barely affected the performance at all.
Of course, you might not want to spend $6 on a bag of insulation to tweak a free speaker, but you could use ordinary fiberglass insulation as long as you don’t mind itching for an hour afterward.
If you’re fortunate enough to have gotten in on the Pringles can speaker deal, your solution for the best sound is simple: Stuff the can. Given that the small Grab & Go! Stack doesn’t sound or measure much different from the big Super Stack, I’d recommend going with the small one just ’cause it’ll clutter your desk less. And don’t toss the Pringles can speaker if you upgrade to something better. With Warhols now fetching as much as $100 million, you never know what the Pringles can speaker might be worth someday.
Brent Butterworth and Geoff Morrison combine their years of gear testing and knowledge in one überblog of irreverence and techiness.










Copyright © 2013 Bonnier Corp. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.


Great write up. Love the idea of trying to improve on something that was cheap or free. More these would be great.
This is a fun story idea. I have one of the Pringles speakers, I mean it was free after all, and I must say I was quite surprised how well it did sound. I'll have to try the stuffing idea, but I've gotten free audio devices before, so extremely nasty sounding Coke earbuds to name one, that didn't come anywhere near the good sound of the Pringles speaker. So why this isn't perfect, there are much worse things out there in the free audio swag jungle!
Hey,
Why not try it with a mostly-full can of chips?
Just spit-balling here....
does it sound better than the altec lansing orbit? ;-)
@wildroamer: A GROSS omission on my part! Maybe I'll try it although I really don't want to eat any more of those @#$% chips.
@oluv: Just compared them. Not even close. The Orbit is much better.
Next project "Sub woofer" garbage can.
I believe that you could have taken this experiment a bit further by doing a few more things. First, you could have duct-taped the outside of the can to dampen/stiffen the enclosure. Second, you could have opened up that vent on the back with a Dremel (may or may not have helped). Third, you could have experimented with increasing the voltage to the amplifier. Of course, the last would break from the convenient nature of the speaker. But hey, if you're gonna try to get fancy sound out of a free speaker, you may as well go overboard.
The pringles offer is back open between 05/15/12 and 10/31/12. go to
http://www.pringles.com/current-promotions
Also there are many mods online that improve the bass by putting ports in the can
or make a bass reflex cardboard box. (search you tube)