
Using my custom-built testing switcher, I compared the CSX-12 Mark II with various subs I had on hand, including a Hsu VTF-15H, a Klipsch SW-310, a MartinLogan Dynamo 1000 and a Wisdom Audio SCS “suitcase sub.” Note that the cost for all of these is at least twice that of the CSX-12 Mark II. For my first tests, I plugged the cables in at random so I didn’t know which sub was which on the switcher control. I later listened to the CSX-12 Mark II on its own.
Gear reviewers often make sloppy use of words like “outstanding” to describe products that may sound great but don’t actually stand out from other good products in their category. When I describe the CSX-12’s performance as outstanding, I mean it really does stand out. In fact, in the upper bass range it’s the equal of the 37-percent-larger, more than twice-as-expensive Hsu VTF-15H. (While it may seem impossible that the CSX-12 Mark II could match the bigger Hsu, in the upper bass octave from 40 to 80 Hz the maximum output of large subwoofers is typically dictated by their limiter settings, which seem to be more conservative in the VTF-15H.)
The Final Destination 2 DVD clearly demonstrated the CSX-12’s genuinely outstanding performance. In most scenes, the CSX-12 Mark II and the VTF-15H sounded about the same. Both had an impact that was nothing short of brutal. With most of the sound effects in the awesome multi-vehicle pileup that opens the movie — such as the crash of a giant log through a highway patrolman’s windshield — I could barely tell the difference between the two. Both outperformed all the other subs in the intensity and power of their upper bass output.
In the most dramatic car crashes, I could hear the deeper response of the Hsu’s much bigger enclosure. My chair shook a little more and the room felt more energized. I had the same experience when I played the opening scene from Star Wars, Episode II: Attack of the Clones. My ears, my body and, later, my spectrum analyzer told me that the VTF-15H was producing a lot more energy in the bottom 2/3-octave of bass, from 20 to 32 Hz. Still, in every demanding action movie I played, the CSX-12 Mark II easily gave me the “thrill ride” effect I wanted.
The CSX-12 Mark II sounded great with stereo music, especially pop and rock. Its definition and punch were unsurpassed by any of the other subs. In fact, it seemed to deliver a slightly exaggerated sense of punch on certain cuts, such as Steely Dan’s “Aja.” I’m not sure if it’s the only sub that accurately portrayed the bass in this tune, or if it’s adding something extra. Hell, I wonder if the guys in Steely Dan would be sure. Regardless, the differences I’m talking about here are subtle. The point is that the CSX-12 Mark II could work just fine even in a serious audiophile setup.
Only a few instruments, such as the kick drum in Mötley Crüe’s “Kickstart My Heart” and the pipe organ in the Michael Murray/San Francisco Symphony recording of Joseph Jongen’s Symphony Concertante, revealed the limits of the CSX-12 Mark II’s bass extension. On these, the sub sounded a tad strained, and I could hear a bit of noise coming from its slotted front port.










Copyright © 2013 Bonnier Corp. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.

Hi Brent,
I am just now checking out subwoofers. So, very much appreciate your article- all of your articles.
Am looking to get a sub to fill out the lower Hz ranges mostly for music. Earth shaking is not critical to me. Naturalness is. Initially may link the sub up to the updated Denon D-M39S micro system. Eventually likely up to my old, but efficient Klipsch Hersey speakers, plus a Denon or Marantz AVR receiver (or similar).
Which do you prefer: the Cadence CSX-12 sub, or the older HSU STF-2 (or, even the STF-1)? (HSU's warranty is great.) Possibly even another sub as of 2013...
Room is 17.5X18.5 ft with a slight A frame shaped wood ceiling. Floor is cement covered by a rug.
Thanks for your thoughts, Brent.
Angusmerlin
PS>> am not techy
Hi, Angus. For your tastes, I would recommend the Hsu. The CSX-12 is more a "punch sub," better for giving you that high-impact home theater sound than delivering the kind of natural-sounding bass you're describing.
Hi brent
thanks for a very imformative review
as for me long time lurker but trying to upgrade my subwoofer (previous one was from yamaha Htib with 8 inch driver and 100w rms i think)
just want to know would cadence csx12 be a better option than a klipsch RW12d
right now on sale at new egg for about 299 which would make it a 12 dollar difference
use will be mostly for movies!
thanks for your input