
Key Features:
• 12-inch woofer
• 225 watt amplifier
• Daisy-chaining via RJ11 jacks
• stereo pair of RCA inputs
• 140-120 Hz crossover frequency control
• Level control
• Bass boost control
• 0-180° phase control
• Crossover bypass switch
Dimensions + Weight:
• 18 1/4 x 17 3/4 x 20 in., 67.25 lbs.
Held up against the $3,499 Velodyne DD-12+ and other high-end 12-inch subwoofers that populate the CEDIA Expo, the $399 Cadence CSX-12 Mark II seems incredibly affordable. In the context of Amazon.com (where you can easily pick up a 12-inch subwoofer for under $200), the CSX-12 Mark II looks rather pricey. Which perception is correct?
Although it may seem a little obvious to say it, all 12-inch subs are not created equal. Construction makes a big difference with subwoofers. An engineer designing an affordable main speaker can sometimes “get lucky” — i.e., find a combination of inexpensive drivers that works well together with a simple, low-cost crossover. But with subwoofers, there’s really no way to get lucky. To build a great sub, you need a sturdy cabinet, a stiff woofer cone, a strong woofer magnet and either a powerful amp or a big enclosure (or both). Careful tuning can make a difference, but it can’t turn a bunch of cheap parts into a powerhouse sub.
The CSX-12 Mark II suffers none of the maladies common to cheap subs, such as flimsy particleboard cabinets, feeble amplifiers and/or frail woofer cones. Its woofer has a thick treated-pulp (the speaker industry’s euphemism for “paper”) cone and a 90-ounce magnet. Its cabinet is built from 0.75-inch MDF — not exactly high-end material, but adequate if reasonably well-braced inside. Its internal amp rates at 225 watts RMS at 1 percent distortion, less than the 1,000-plus watts many digital amps offer, but enough to do the job. And its cabinet measures 18.25 x 17.75 x 20 inches, which is large for a 12-incher. In fact, it’s about the same size as the 15-inch sub I built for my 4-2-1 subwoofer shootout.
If you visit the Cadence Website to check out the CSX-12 Mark II, don’t get too excited by the “Linear Class A 450 watts dynamic power” description in the specs; it appears to be the work of a marketing guy’s overactive imagination. A Class A 225-watt RMS amp would be about the size of a window-mount air conditioner and would throw off enough heat to warm a bedroom in the middle of winter.
Surprisingly for a budget model, the CSX-12 Mark II isn’t even ugly — not by subwoofer standards, anyway. The industrial design is slick and the gloss-black front baffle looks handsome with its inset grille.










Copyright © 2013 Bonnier Corp. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.


Hi Brent,
I am just now checking out subwoofers. So, very much appreciate your article- all of your articles.
Am looking to get a sub to fill out the lower Hz ranges mostly for music. Earth shaking is not critical to me. Naturalness is. Initially may link the sub up to the updated Denon D-M39S micro system. Eventually likely up to my old, but efficient Klipsch Hersey speakers, plus a Denon or Marantz AVR receiver (or similar).
Which do you prefer: the Cadence CSX-12 sub, or the older HSU STF-2 (or, even the STF-1)? (HSU's warranty is great.) Possibly even another sub as of 2013...
Room is 17.5X18.5 ft with a slight A frame shaped wood ceiling. Floor is cement covered by a rug.
Thanks for your thoughts, Brent.
Angusmerlin
PS>> am not techy
Hi, Angus. For your tastes, I would recommend the Hsu. The CSX-12 is more a "punch sub," better for giving you that high-impact home theater sound than delivering the kind of natural-sounding bass you're describing.
Hi brent
thanks for a very imformative review
as for me long time lurker but trying to upgrade my subwoofer (previous one was from yamaha Htib with 8 inch driver and 100w rms i think)
just want to know would cadence csx12 be a better option than a klipsch RW12d
right now on sale at new egg for about 299 which would make it a 12 dollar difference
use will be mostly for movies!
thanks for your input