
TEST BENCH

DOLBY DIGITAL PERFORMANCE
All data were obtained from various test DVDs using 16-bit dithered test signals, which set limits on measured distortion and noise performance. Reference input level is -20 dBFS, and reference output is 1 watt into 8 ohms. Volume setting for reference level was 1.5. All level trims at zero, except for subwoofer-related tests, all speakers were set to "large," subwoofer on. All are worst-case figures where applicable.
Output at clipping (1 kHz into 8/4 ohms)
1 channel driven: 183/298 W (22.6/24.7 dBW)
5 channels driven (8 ohms): 132 W (21.2 dBW)
7 channels driven (8 ohms): 60 W (17.8 dBW)*
* Power tests on more 7 channels simultaneously (or more) quickly induced current limiting to a level of approximately 60 watts on all channels
Distortion at 1 watt (THD+N, 1 kHz)
8/4 ohms: 0.02/0.03%
Noise level (A-wtd): -75.9 dB
Excess noise (with sine tone)
16-bit (EN16): 0.2 dB
Frequency response: 20 Hz to 20 kHz +0, -0.1 dB
MULTICHANNEL PERFORMANCE, ANALOG INPUT
Reference input and output level is 200 mV; volume setting for reference output level was 2.
Distortion (THD+N, 1 kHz, 8 ohms): 0.015%
Noise level (A-wtd.): -92.3
Frequency response: <10 Hz to >200 kHz +0, -3 dB
STEREO PERFORMANCE, DIGITAL INPUT
Reference level is -20 dBFS; all level trims at zero. Volume setting for reference level was 1.
Output at clipping (1 kHz, 8/4 ohms, both channels driven): 164/235 W (22.1 /23.7 dBW)
Distortion at reference level: 0.02%
Linearity error (at -90 dBFS): 0.0 dB
Noise level (A-wtd): -75.7 dB
with >96-kHz/24-bit signals: -88.6 dB
Excess noise (with/without sine tone)
16-bit (EN16): 0.1/0.1 dB
quasi-20-bit (EN20): 7.4/7.4 dB
Noise modulation: 0.1 dB
Frequency response: <10 Hz to 20 kHz +0, -0.15 dB
with 96-kHz/24-bit signals: <10 Hz to 44.8 kHz +0, -0.8 dB
BASS-MANAGEMENT PERFORMANCE
Measured results obtained with Dolby Digital test signals.
Subwoofer-output frequency response (crossover set to 80 Hz): 24 dB/octave above -6-dB rolloff point of 80 Hz
High-pass-filter frequency response (crossover set to 80 Hz): 12 dB/octave below -3-dB rolloff point of 80 Hz
Maximum unclipped subwoofer output (trim at 0): 4.1v
Subwoofer distortion (from 6-channel, 30-Hz, 0-dBFS signal; subwoofer trim set to 0): 4.5%
Crossover consistency: bass crossover frequency and slope were consistent for all sources and formats; however, filter slopes were less smooth and accurate with Dolby Digital signals
Speaker size selection: all channels can be set to "small"
Speaker-distance compensation: available for all main channels.
I've long come to expect superb technical performance from Denon receivers, and that's what we got from the AVR-4810CI. Power was amply above spec, up to and including 5 channels driven (Denon's specs, like many today, only explicitly mention a maximum of 2 channels driven at once); 7 and 8-channel tests ran into deliberate limiting triggered by more than a second or two of clipping-level drive, which is neither uncommon nor particularly meaningful. Better still, virtually every low-power noise and distortion test was an all-time best, including PCM-stereo signal-to-noise that was bang on the theoretically perfect value (-75.7 dBw) for our dithered-noise test environment (the only meaningful way to express S/N for a digital-audio device), and similarly perfect excess-noise and linearity results.
One anomaly: the Denon receiver's crossover-filter slopes, which with PCM-stereo signals kneed precisely at the selected frequency (80 Hz for our tests) and displayed perfectly smooth 12/24 dB-per-octave rolloffs, were somewhat less accurate, and visibly less smooth on Dolby Digital signals, though not to any degree I could expect to be audible.










Copyright © 2013 Bonnier Corp. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.

Just read your article on the Denon AVR4810CI. I was pleased that the bottom line was good. You mentioned that at $3000 it wasn't a value. I just purchased and am installing one that I purchased from Crutchfield at $1799. The reason it was so reduced was Denon is about to replce it and it's about 3 year old technology. Would you consider this a value? I'm not interested in 3D . looking forward to your opinion! Thanks Wally Dominick (natdim@aol.com)