Close

Member Login

Invalid username or password.
Incorrect Login. Please try again.

Not a member?

Sign up and join a community that's passionate about exploring the world of entertainment & technology.

30 Minutes with Lindsey Buckingham

The chief architect of the Fleetwood Mac sound for the past 3 decades cuts Under the Skin (Reprise), only his fourth solo album in 25 years. Its stark honesty and scaled-down production mark it as his most personal work yet.

30 Minutes with Lindsey BuckinghamI spoke with [original Rumours engineer and renowned surround-sound producer] Ken Caillat about all this a few years ago, and he told me he had completed surround mixes of both Tusk [1979] and the Fleetwood Mac "white" album [i.e., the self-titled one from 1975]. He also said he had played them for you and the band and that the reaction was very positive. [Caillat wrote in an email to Mettler on December 10, 2003: "The band went crazy when they heard them."] Do you recall that at all?
Yes! I wonder what happened to them.

They never came out.
I don't know why they never came out, but maybe it was considered too much of a specialty thing or... [pauses] I can never guess what's going on in the minds of record company executives.

Me neither. Have surround-sound remixes ever crossed your mind in terms of your solo projects?
Well, I haven't really thought about it. There's a certain amount of economics that drive those specialty things, and usually my solo work doesn't fall into that strata. [laughs] But now that you mention it, it's probably not a bad idea. I'll bring it up to somebody, and see if they look at me funny.

No, it's all good - go for it. You're endorsed by the sound-quality community out here.
That's good to know.

How do you feel about people listening to digital music files?
I don't have a particularly bad feeling about that. You hear people saying that the sound isn't as good, but I can't necessarily judge that, because when I was growing up, most of my musical nurturing came from my brother's 45s, which were very lo-fi and listened to on a crummy RCA 45 player. You know, 45s were basically a single-song format. Not that there weren't albums at that time, but the album as an artform hadn't really come into its own. But I can't look back and say, "that was a bad way to listen to music." It certainly was a less-sophisticated way, on an audio level, but if you had taken a 45 and put it on something that sounded better, who's to say? I'm not someone who feels the idea of a single-song download means that we're losing something.

Post a Comment
(1500 Characters or less)
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.
All submitted comments are subject to the license terms set forth in our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use